Source: dailypress.com
Where the Daily Press stands
Priorities
Newport News should focus on essentials, not the Deep Creek pier
With all the needs facing Newport News taxpayers, now and in the foreseeable future, there’s one that doesn’t seem to rise high on the priority list: rebuilding the pier at the end of Deep Creek Road. Or at least not high enough to claim scarce dollars when the city is facing much more significant needs, among them homeowners who want any relief they can get from the tax man.
The pier’s history is complicated. Back in the 1930s, Warwick County, now part of Newport News, agreed to build a public pier in exchange for some land that gives access to the waterfront at the end of Deep Creek Road. For decades, that deal worked out well. Watermen got a place they could dock and work on their boats, at no charge. People, primarily those living nearby, got a lovely place to commune with the James River.
But the pier has deteriorated. Now it’s unsafe, and the city has started dismantling it.
That has sparked some outrage — from watermen and those who support them, from some area residents, from members of the family that originally made the deal with Warwick County.
But there is a large group that isn’t being heard from. It’s all the taxpayers who would have to pay for a new pier, a cost that would approach $700,000 to $1 million to do it right (which means with the parking and restrooms a public amenity requires). It’s all the people who realize that doesn’t make sense when there’s another, better-equipped city-owned pier across the creek.
It’s all the citizens who question the cost-benefit ratio of a costly new pier that would primarily benefit a handful of watermen and a limited neighborhood, for relatively few others trek all the way down Deep CreekRoad to enjoy it. It’s all the citizens who question whether they should have to provide free dockage for boat owners.
And the biggest group not being heard from: all the citizens who look at the price tag for a pier done right and would rather put that money into something that’s more pressing or would reach more citizens — like the new fire station and recreation center that are needed. And while a new pier would be a capital expense, spread over so many years it would have an imperceptible effect on tax rates in any given year, the city would be hard pressed to convince taxpayers who are feeling beleaguered that it needs every dollar it’s collecting if it were spending some of them on something so obviously unnecessary.
“Keep the promise” is the cry of some who want the Deep Creek pier rebuilt, referring to the promise the county of Warwick made and the city of Newport News inherited to maintain a pier in exchange for the gift of land (the specifics aren’t entirely clear, in the absence of documentation). But sometimes promises, whether made by people or cities, can’t bind forever.
Things change. The people who gathered in Bonniebelle Melzer’s kitchen seven decades ago probably couldn’t foresee the conditions that prevail today: that only a few watermen now use the pier regularly. That the bustling oyster-harvesting industry is largely gone, along with the oyster population in the Chesapeake Bay. That the city has grown and sprawled out, and most of its residents live far from Deep Creek.
Do the citizens of Newport News really want their city bound to a 70-year-old deal that will cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars, when there is a more cost-effective alternative: move operations to the Menchville side of the creek, and see what can be done to address boat owners’ concerns that the Menchville side is less protected in storms? It makes more sense to invest in this facility, because it already has the necessities (parking and bathrooms).
As for keeping the spirit of “the promise,” Newport News has done more than many localities to support the seafood industry. It operates the Small Boat Harbor and developed the Seafood Industrial Park there to provide the facilities commercial fishermen and processors need. And it’s improving the Menchville facility.
As for local residents’ desire for a pier where they can enjoy sunsets and time with their kids, there are a couple of possibilities worth discussing. The city could build a scaled-down pedestrian pier. Or the neighbors could get together to see if they could build a neighborhood pier on their own, if they could work out the access and ownership issues. This area is dotted with private piers.
But what doesn’t make sense is for the city to spend a lot of taxpayers’ money on something that is not essential, not a priority, and not going to benefit more than a few of those who will have to furnish those tax dollars.
The Rebuttal
NN Priorities
Your editorial “Priorities,” Nov. 20, was interesting. Unfortunately, you failed to discuss and reveal other priorities of Newport News City Council. Instead, you chose to attack the Deep Creek pier.
Where is your outrage at the $275,000 paid for a few steel beams that attempt (miserably) to glorify the airport? Why do you not mention the spending plans for “cultural” facilities during the next five years –– $2,500,000 for the USS Monitor Center, $900,000 to the Peninsula Fine Arts Center, $200,000 to the American Theatre in Hampton, which are not “priorities” for most Newport News residents who worry how they will pay next month’s rent or mortgage.
How about questioning the $5,570,000 planned for “golf course renovation”? Is this a priority so that unemployed residents can distract themselves? Finally, why not question the “priority” of giving $22,500,000 to wealthy developers, businessmen and lawyers under the guise of “economic development projects” over the next five years? All of the above are paid by our tax dollars.
John J. Procyson
Newport News